UPDATED: 02-05-26 17:14 PDT

men Rutgers 1
  
Rutgers               
W-L: ( 1- 0) PR = 97.4000

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 131 N Jacksonville ASUN ( 0- 1, 96.4) 11-10 207 H Army PATRIOT ( 1- 0, 98.9) 214 A Stony Brook CAA ( 0- 0, 96.9) 221 H Villanova BE ( 0- 0, 96.9) 224 H LIU NEC ( 0- 0, 96.9) 228 H Hofstra CAA ( 0- 0, 96.9) 307 A Princeton IVY ( 0- 0, 96.9) 310 A St Johns BE ( 0- 0, 96.9) 314 H Bellarmine ASUN ( 0- 0, 96.9) 321 H Ohio State B10 ( 1- 0, 98.9) 329 H Johns Hopkins B10 ( 0- 0, 96.9) 404 A Michigan B10 ( 1- 0, 98.9) 411 A Maryland B10 ( 0- 0, 96.9) 417 H Penn State B10 ( 1- 0, 98.4)

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   131 N Jacksonville           11-10       1     1           0.00

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

Rutgers Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Air Force Rutgers   Rutgers
Albany Rutgers   Rutgers
Army Army   Army
Bellarmine Rutgers   Rutgers
Binghamton Rutgers   Rutgers
Boston Univ Rutgers   Rutgers
Brown Rutgers   Rutgers
Bryant Rutgers   Rutgers
Bucknell Bucknell   Bucknell
Canisius Rutgers   Rutgers
Cleveland State Rutgers   Rutgers
Colgate Rutgers   Rutgers
Cornell Rutgers   Rutgers
Dartmouth Rutgers   Rutgers
Delaware Rutgers   Rutgers
Denver Denver   Denver
Detroit Mercy Rutgers   Rutgers
Drexel Rutgers   Rutgers
Duke Rutgers   Rutgers
Fairfield Rutgers   Rutgers
Georgetown Rutgers   Rutgers
Hampton Rutgers   Rutgers
Harvard Rutgers   Rutgers
High Point Rutgers   Rutgers
Hobart Rutgers   Rutgers
Hofstra Rutgers   Rutgers
Holy Cross Rutgers   Rutgers
Iona Rutgers   Rutgers
Jacksonville Rutgers Rutgers  
Johns Hopkins Rutgers   Rutgers
Lafayette Rutgers   Rutgers
Le Moyne Rutgers   Rutgers
Lehigh Rutgers   Rutgers
LIU Rutgers   Rutgers
Loyola Rutgers   Rutgers
Manhattan Rutgers   Rutgers
Marist Rutgers   Rutgers
Marquette Rutgers   Rutgers
Maryland Rutgers   Rutgers
Massachusetts Rutgers   Rutgers
UMassLowell Rutgers   Rutgers
Mercer Mercer   Mercer
Mercyhurst Rutgers   Rutgers
Merrimack Rutgers   Rutgers
Michigan Michigan   Michigan
Monmouth Rutgers   Rutgers
Mt St Marys Rutgers   Rutgers
Navy Rutgers   Rutgers
NJIT NJIT   NJIT
North Carolina Rutgers   Rutgers
Notre Dame Rutgers   Rutgers
Ohio State Ohio State   Ohio State
Pennsylvania Rutgers   Rutgers
Penn State Penn State   Penn State
Princeton Rutgers   Rutgers
Providence Providence   Providence
Queens Rutgers   Rutgers
Quinnipiac Rutgers   Rutgers
Richmond Rutgers   Rutgers
Robert Morris Rutgers   Rutgers
Sacred Heart Rutgers   Rutgers
Siena Rutgers   Rutgers
St Bonnies Rutgers   Rutgers
St Johns Rutgers   Rutgers
St Josephs Rutgers   Rutgers
Stony Brook Rutgers   Rutgers
Syracuse Syracuse   Syracuse
Towson Rutgers   Rutgers
UMBC Rutgers   Rutgers
Utah Rutgers   Rutgers
Vermont Rutgers   Rutgers
Villanova Rutgers   Rutgers
Virginia Rutgers   Rutgers
VMI Rutgers   Rutgers
Wagner Rutgers   Rutgers
Yale Rutgers   Rutgers

PowerWise = 66


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 0.31

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 N Jacksonville    ( 0- 1, 96.4)    11-10       -3.50       2.50      -0.00         0.31             0.78
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                         0.78

winning pts = 0.7792 losing points = 0.0000

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------